![]() |
Pretty much every seasoned web user has an account with at least one of the popular social networks, like MySpace, Facebook, Hi5 and LinkedIn.
There are countless more such networks and the trend seems to be reaching every niche one can possibly imagine.
It’s a good thing because the more people work together, the faster we can achieve great things but then again, not all social networks vye to reinvent a better world as most of them are just endless streams of largely useless chatter where people interact without actually attempting to truly connect.
Not all communications have to be meaningful to be interesting for those engaging in it but it can seem like a lot of lost energy to fuel such large networks that basically amount to nothing. But that’s irrelevant, in a way, because millions of people still stampede towards these “rate me if you like me” type of social networks so in itself, there has to be a genuine need underneath all that digital noise.
So people, from the world over, are assisting to the rise of the social networks.
In and of itself, that’s big but is this a prelude to something even bigger or is social networking as we know it as good as it’s going to get?
That’s an excellent question and while nobody can say for sure, the featureset of a typical social network pretty much engulfs everything else with Twitter-like streams, blogs, forums, friend rings and chats, all packed into a single web destination which feels coherent to the user. So, featurewise, social networks pack quite a punch. Not all the features are as developed as “single application scripts” but to the user, that seems to matter very little as all they see is the feature itself and not the technology supporting it.
Social networking has everything to do with the cloud where the size and speed of hosting appears to be somewhat infinite, from a user’s standpoint. It’s probably the web 2.0 most compelling spinoff since a social network is often the place where people finally settle after looking at all sorts of other web services.
And since online social networking is generally free, millions of people just open up an account figuring it’s a good deal. Over time, some build up very rich offerings in their “social realm” and others never return after signing-up. The social networks nevertheless connect hundreds of millions of people daily for business and pleasure.
Among the niche-type social networks to watch out for, the following cities now have their own job-centric social networks: Miami, Daytona Beach, Tampa Bay, Detroit, Toronto and Montreal (with more cities to come). It’s an excellent idea as employers and workers are always looking for new ways to connect, locally.
As you can see, social networks will continue to evolve and amaze those who watch them thrive in all sorts of directions, with more power, more storage and more features than ever before.
For all these reasons and many more, it may seem like social networks have reached a plateau but in reality, they may just be warming up for a highly networked future.
Tags: social networks, social networking, online networks, people, connect, connections, online friends, myspace, facebook, hi5, linkedin, networked, jobs, business, niche networks, members, free
There’s a lot of talk about the value of adding social networking to the communications strategy, in countless organizations who see the benefits but fear the downsides.
While there’s little doubt getting employees communicating with each other will help bring teamwork to a whole new level, allowing everybody the opportunity to contribute the organization’s success through blogs, wikis and such might generate some initial confusion.
The following five (5) best practices tips will help you ensure your business social networking project gets done right.
Regarding search, you could also allow for external engines to query your internal indexes and content but given that we’re dealing with business social networks, that might only be a good idea for a few companies.
Business social networks are all about offering the state of the art in online networking inside the company so employees don’t have to venture outside for such features as blogging and wikis.
Furthermore, many companies are still clueless on how to transfer knowledge between more experienced workers and those who will (some day) replace them. Social networks can help with this by creating easily accessible archives of work-related content which, in time, might prove quite valuable.
Many businesses also use social networking for recruitment purposes. Internal promotion can be simplified and external recruitment of fresh talent can surely benefit from internal referrals. Human resources people usually have good words for internal social networks because, among other things, it empowers them with a powerful communications tool that all employees are likely to use.
It’s pretty clear that your own deployment will be customized to fit your own needs but overall, setting up a business social network will never let management indifferent.
So, go ahead and fire up your own enterprise social network. You’ll quickly see just how wise “your crowd” really is.
Tags: business social networking, social networks, socially, employees, employers, companies, enterprises, social nets, blogger, facebook, linkedin, twitter, wikipedia, blogs, wikis, archives, information archives, user adoption, networking, community, search engine
At a time when everybody can easily set up a full blown blog (think WordPress), including revenue generating advertising, why would so many people be wasting their time posting quality content in (other people’s) social networks?
If you look at the member count at MySpace, Gather, Orkut, Facebook and Hi5, to name only those, it’s clear that being there has a lot to do with connecting family, friends and co-workers. While a minority of members actually take the time to post large amounts of content (of varying usefulness), most people just click around rather aimlessly — akin to wasting time in the local mall, on a rainy day.
So it seems that while a proverbial handful of people are there to obtain some form of visibility for their content, the bulk of these social network members are pretty clueless about “what else” they could be doing, other than surfing away their free time.
In today’s most popular networks, there’s a lot to do such as dressing up the profile, posting articles, images, videos, comments (in response to other people’s articles, blog-style), adding up friends and joining groups. So why are people so uninterested by all these features? It could be many things but it basically comes down to each member’s perception of the service. Said differently, to participate, the member has to find that posting content in a social network is useful… for him or her!
Social networks are allegedly bringing in large amounts of advertising money (pay-per-click or otherwise) for their owners but the members are always treated as “those who freely provide the content” so that pretty much insures that they’ll never get rich “networking” in other people’s (rather tightly controlled) web properties.
Maybe some musical artists on MySpace Music will convince a few more fans to listen to their music along the way but for most artists, it’s not the fastest route to financial independance. Similarly, some web marketers have tried peddling all sorts of things to all sorts of crowds, namely through groups, although eventually, they’re caught “abusing” the social network and either get their account downgraded or banned.
So we’re down to seeing social networks as big (and sometimes huge), ongoing, garden cocktail parties where everyone’s basically free to join but more likely uninterested enough to eventually forget they even have a working membership. Social networks therefore try to muster members’ attention with special events, promotions and features. It seems to be having very uneven levels of success, depending on the perceived value for the user, if any.
The Frankenstein-like privacy policy nightmares related to these social networks will be the main theme for an upcoming article but suffice it to say that trusting these particular “third-party” web services with information you hold dear, like your entire identity, might turn out to be a very, very bad idea.
So should bloggers also have their “spin marketing” account in each of these social networks to generate theme-specific unique visits to their blogs? It depends. If no other alternative exists, social networks might be better than nothing but that’s about it. For instance, a blogger’s not likely to hit Google‘s top search spot because he cross-posted lead-generating content in his MySpace or Orkut account. It might help (over the very long run) but it’s not going to make a significant impact.
It’s a gradual process, really.
Most people get sucked into these networks to “become (online) friends” to their offline counterparts. Once in a while, they get a message from their friends, through the social network. At this point, most people wonder if the whole social networking thing is really worth it but deleting their account is made so ridiculously difficult (or tricky) that they just keep it as is until things hopefully become less entangled.
So even though social networks are said to be handling hundreds of millions of member profiles, one has to wonder if the members are really getting a valuable payoff, at their end of the deal. After all, (1) they’re actively or passively censored, (2) they can’t (legally) make any money with (pay-per-click) advertising, (3) they instantly lose full property of their content the moment they post it and (4) in the case their profile is abused, they’re legally bound by contract to fully indemnify the social network operator — even if those operators happen to be the culprits!
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg because in most networks, members have very little control over what other members say about them and that could lead down a very slippery slope, online and off.
So at this point, most members might be scratching their heads as to why they’re sticking with these rather insidious networking platforms anyway.
If you’re one of these members, you’re not alone since a lot of people are now backing away from freely giving away their personal information and going back to creating their very own blog in why they control all aspects of the content while remaining the owners of what they create… and getting a bit richer (with PPC ads), in the process.
While most people will continue to use one form or another of social networks, chances are that until the operators come clean, from legal and ethical standpoints, more and more people will see more use in staying away from these networks than joining them.
After all, giving away -everything- you think up can’t be that useful for you although, in the global scheme of things, it’ll make total strangers (the social network owners) that much richer!
Tags: social networks, usefulness, networking, people, myspace, gather, orkut, facebook, hi5, legal, ethical
While joining an online social network may be easy, deleting your (potentially embarrassing) account from it may -never- be possible.
If you sign-up with Facebook, MySpace, Bebo or almost any other flavor of such “networking” services, you better kiss your privacy goodbye.
From the moment you start posting content, remember that everything you post is now owned by another entity and whatever control you have over your “seemingly private data” is merely a permission that’s temporarily “granted” to you.
While social networks might have had lofty ideals, their current obsession with total ownership of all the content floating within their network coupled with twisted deletion procedures go to paint a much murkier picture of their “service” where, among other things, YOUR personal information is a commodity sold and resold forever, however desperate you may be to have that data permanently deleted.
Nowadays, more and more social networking victims are exiting the scene entirely because they’ve just discovered how these outfits operate. When the smoke clears, members trying to delete their account almost always end up losing a mix of (1) time, (2) money and (3) peace of mind.
Savvy web surfers have steered clear of social networks from the moment they took about 30 minutes of their time to read their “privacy policy” along with equally frightening their “terms of use”. In a nutshell, they own anything you do on their network, wether its usage pattern or actual postings… forever!
If you’re looking to exit any of these mostly useless, junk filled, spam circulating social networks, don’t settle for mere “deactivation” (like in the case of Facebook) because your data is kept fully intact, until you return.
Don’t hesitate to contact consumer defense groups during your account deletion process because even though you can beg the member service clerk all you want (usually without success), you’ll likely need the added muscle to be sure your data is -really- deleted, forever.
Until this privacy protection quagmire is resolved, to the user’s advantage, joining social networks will continue to be very risky business that could cost you dearly.
Tags: social networks, facebook, myspace, bebo, account deletion, privacy, risk