<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a future for Quebec&#8217;s &#8220;.qc&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beep.name/2008/05/06/is-there-a-future-for-quebecs-qc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beep.name/2008/05/06/is-there-a-future-for-quebecs-qc/</link>
	<description>Everything about domain names and online marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Hubert</title>
		<link>http://beep.name/2008/05/06/is-there-a-future-for-quebecs-qc/comment-page-1/#comment-39700</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Hubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beep.name/?p=322#comment-39700</guid>
		<description>May be OK for certains!
But I do not want to have someone faster than me registering mydomain.qc when I own mydomain.ca!
It will create a mess if an existing domain in .ca can be registered by anyone in .qc!
One thing to do, masking &quot;ca&quot; in &quot;qc.ca&quot; only for those wanting to see only &quot;qc&quot; and leave everything as they are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be OK for certains!<br />
But I do not want to have someone faster than me registering mydomain.qc when I own mydomain.ca!<br />
It will create a mess if an existing domain in .ca can be registered by anyone in .qc!<br />
One thing to do, masking &#8220;ca&#8221; in &#8220;qc.ca&#8221; only for those wanting to see only &#8220;qc&#8221; and leave everything as they are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgelinas</title>
		<link>http://beep.name/2008/05/06/is-there-a-future-for-quebecs-qc/comment-page-1/#comment-36886</link>
		<dc:creator>cgelinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beep.name/?p=322#comment-36886</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After publishing this article, I asked the <a href="http://cira.ca/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">CIRA</a> if it had an official position regarding the &#8220;Point-QC&#8221; movement.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the (very short) answer I received:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Hello Claude,</p>
<p>Thank you for your request. This matter does not fall under our jurisdiction. You may wish to visit <a href="http://www.icann.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org</a> for more information on the domain name allocation.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p><a href="mailto:melisa.db@cira.ca" rel="nofollow">Melisa Durak</a><br />
Public Relations and Communications Specialist<br />
Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>So basically, the CIRA states —for the record— that the whole &#8220;Point-QC&#8221; thing is NOT occuring under their strict jurisdiction. Since the rise of a &#8220;Quebec-centric&#8221; domain name suffix is likely to (eventually) impact the CIRA in a number of ways, their official position could change, over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
